Authority is exercised legitimately when it acts for the common good and employs morally licit means to attain it. Therefore, political regimes must be determined by the free decision of their citizens. They should respect the principle of the “rule of law” in which the law, and not the arbitrary will of some, is sovereign. Unjust laws and measures contrary to the moral order are not binding in conscience.
Veja este tema no Catecismo
Paragraph 1903
1903. Authority is exercised legitimately only when it seeks the common good of the group concerned and if it employs morally licit means to attain it. If rulers were to enact unjust laws or take measures contrary to the moral order, such arrangements would not be binding in conscience. In such a case, "authority breaks down completely and results in shameful abuse."23
Paragraph 1904
1904. "It is preferable that each power be balanced by other powers and by other spheres of responsibility which keep it within proper bounds. This is the principle of the 'rule of law,' in which the law is sovereign and not the arbitrary will of men."
Paragraph 1921
1921. Authority is exercised legitimately if it is committed to the common good of society. To attain this it must employ morally acceptable means.
Paragraph 1922
1922. The diversity of political regimes is legitimate, provided they contribute to the good of the community.
Acesse nossos estudos biblicos:
How the Annunciation Story Can Inspire Us to Trust God (Luke 1:26-38)
What does 1 John 2:29 teach us about God’s holiness and justice?
What does Malachi 2:1-2 mean about the danger of falling away from God?
What does the phrase “we live by faith, not by sight” in 2 Corinthians 5:7 mean?
How does Job 38:1-11 reveal God’s sovereignty in the midst of suffering?
